Archive for March, 2010

Despite Plenty to Worry About the Market Keeps Marching

Monday, March 29th, 2010
The stock market seems to be climbing the proverbial “wall of worry.”
 
Despite potential road hazards such as sovereign debt issues, rising interest rates, a weak job market, and a stalled housing recovery, investors bid up stock prices last week to an 18-month high, according to MarketWatch. Of course, these things could eventually affect stock prices, but, for now, stocks are riding the momentum of improving earnings and some underlying stability in the economy.
 
Lack of job growth has been a major problem for our economy the past couple years, but that could change this week. On April 2, the government will release the March employment report and, according to CNBC, economists expect it to show a rise of about 200,000 non-farm jobs. That would be a small down payment on the 8.4 million jobs lost since December 2007, according to Bloomberg. The fact that the S&P 500 has risen for four consecutive weeks may suggest that the market has been anticipating a good report. Ironically, on the day the employment report is released, the U.S. stock market will be closed for the Good Friday holiday, so we won’t know the market’s reaction until the following Monday.
 

Hoxton Financial Hosts Study Group Session on Social Marketing

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

Rob Hoxton of Hoxton Financial and Anna Taylor of Anna Taylor Design will host a virtual meeting for members of the presitgious Phoenix Group to discuss the benefits and pitfalls of social marketing for financial advisors. The Phoenix Group represents the financial planning profession’s most forward thinking firms from across the United States. Membership is by invitation only.

The Harder They Fall

Monday, March 15th, 2010

THE HARDER THEY FALL, the higher they rise. Would it surprise you to know that the worst stocks during the bear market that ran from October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 turned out to be–by far–the best performing stocks over the next 12 months?

Bespoke Investment Group did an interesting study where they took the S&P 500 stocks and ranked them from 1 to 500 with 1 being the worst performer and 500 being the best performer during the October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009 bear market. Then, they sliced this ranking into deciles, with decile 1 being the 50 worst performers, decile 2 the next 50 worst performers all the way to decile 10, which were the 50 best performers.

They discovered that decile 1 (the 50 worst performing stocks during the bear market) turned around and rose, on average, 371% during the next 12 months that ended March 9, 2010. Decile 2, the next 50 worst performers, rose 184% over the ensuing 12 months. By contrast, decile 10, the 50 best performing stocks during the bear market, only rose 30% over the following 12 months. Essentially, the worst stocks during the bear market performed the best during the bull market and vice versa.

The study also showed that the average change of all stocks in the S&P 500 was 122% over the 12 months following the March 9, 2009 low.    

This study points out one reason why understanding human emotion is an important factor in successful investing. Think of it this way: on March 9, 2009, at the bear market low, would you have been enthusiastic about buying stocks that had declined 80-90% over the previous 17 months? Probably not because your emotions would have been so rattled, yet, those were the types of stocks that turned out to be the best performers over the next 12 months, according to Bespoke Investment Group.

As the last few years have shown, successful investing sometimes requires that you gather your courage and do what seems most frightening because the point of maximum “frightening” may also be the point of maximum profit potential.

Is Deflation on the Horizon?

Thursday, March 11th, 2010
IS DEFLATION on the horizon? With all the money being pumped into the worldwide economy and our large state and federal deficits, many investors are preparing for a surge of inflation sometime down the road. Logically, that makes sense–but is that what will really happen?
 
Yes, the U.S. government has tried to pump, prime, and print its way to economic growth, but that has its limits. This money has to find a productive use or else it won’t “stimulate.” Here are a few things that are blocking our stimulus money from stimulating the economy.
 
First, banks have excess cash. Bank lending plays an important role in transforming easy money into economic growth. Unfortunately, banks are sitting on nearly $1 trillion of excess reserves at the Federal Reserve, up from essentially zero in the fall of 2008, according to data from the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank. This is $1 trillion above and beyond reserve requirements, which means banks could use that money to lend to businesses and consumers instead of keeping it safe and secure with the Fed.
 
Second, the unemployment rate is near 10% and jobless claims are remaining stubbornly high. It’s hard for consumers to spend when they are out of a job or worried about losing one.
 
Third, consumers are de-leveraging and paying down debt. By paying off their bills, consumers have less money to spend on goods and services. Less spending may lead to less economic growth.
 
Fourth, because of the deep recession, the U.S. has substantial excess capacity in its industrial sector. According to the Federal Reserve, capacity utilization was only 72.6% in January, which is well below the 1972-2009 average of 80.6%. With all this slack, there may be little upward pressure on prices because factories have room to add production.
 
Fifth, a little followed economic indicator from the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank called the Trimmed Mean Inflation Index (TMII) is declining. This is an alternative measure of inflation, which adjusts for the month-to-month noise found in more popular inflation measures like CPI. For the 12 months ending December 2009, the TMII (inflation rate) was 1.3%–the lowest rate on record dating back to 1978.
 
So, while many people are talking about inflation, we also have to consider the possibility that deflation could happen first and then be followed by inflation down the road. It may not be a high probability, but it is on our radar and could impact the markets if it comes to fruition.